Publication Ethics
1. Author Ethics
-
Authors must ensure the originality of their research and properly cite the work or opinions of others in accordance with the applicable referencing format.
-
Plagiarism and salami publication practices are strictly prohibited.
-
Research involving human subjects must comply with the Declaration of Helsinki, including obtaining approval from an ethics committee and securing informed consent from all participants.
-
For research involving animals, authors must adhere to national and institutional guidelines and ensure efforts are made to minimize animal suffering.
-
Authors must disclose all potential conflicts of interest, including those related to funding, employment, and intellectual property rights.
2. Editor Ethics
-
Editors are responsible for every article published and must assess manuscripts objectively, regardless of the authors’ background.
-
Editors may consult with other editors or reviewers to make final decisions on manuscripts.
-
Editors must maintain the confidentiality of submitted manuscripts and ensure the review process is conducted anonymously (double-blind review).
-
Editors should respect authors' requests concerning manuscript review and address suspected ethical violations in accordance with COPE guidelines.
-
In cases of suspected errors or authorship disputes, editors will refer to COPE guidelines to resolve the issue.
3. Reviewer Ethics
-
Reviewers must provide constructive feedback on potential errors in the research and ensure compliance with publication ethics.
-
Reviewers are expected to complete their tasks within the specified deadlines and inform the editor if they are unable to do so.
-
Reviewers must maintain the confidentiality of the manuscripts and decline to review if a conflict of interest with the author(s) exists.
-
Reviewers should adhere to COPE guidelines when dealing with any ethical concerns or allegations.
-
In cases of suspected errors or authorship disputes, the editor will refer to COPE guidelines for resolution.